Carbon dating in the news
You can't tell this from the notes on the data, but the EIA confirmed to us this was the case.
We can determine what the so called 'bunker fuels' are from the data here.
Thus, it is possible (and, given the Flood, probable) that materials which give radiocarbon dates of tens of thousands of radiocarbon years could have true ages of many fewer calendar years. The shells of live freshwater clams have been radiocarbon dated in excess of 1600 years old, clearly showing that the radiocarbon dating technique is not valid.
This is only available up to 2008.• the International Energy Agency (IEA) has global carbon emissions data up to 2008 But what can we say about this data and how close we are to the collective targets in the Kyoto agreement?
The Kyoto protocol target emission does not include, but this EIA data does.
This gives the clam shell an artificially old radiocarbon age.
This problem, known as the "," is not of very great practical importance for radiocarbon dating since most of the artifacts which are useful for radiocarbon dating purposes and are of interest to archaeology derive from terrestrial organisms which ultimately obtain their carbon atoms from air, not the water. Samples of coal have been found with radiocarbon ages of only 20,000 radiocarbon years or less, thus proving the recent origin of fossil fuels, probably in the Flood.
One fo the aims is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 55% of the 1990 levels by 2012 collectively forcountries starred on this list.